SOCIETY FOR ANIMAL RIGHTS, INC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE TOWNSHIP OF MAHWAH, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND COMMUNITY DOG CONTROL, INC., AND TOWN OF KEARNY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS, AND THE BOROUGH OF BERGENFIELD, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued February 23, 1977.
Decided March 9, 1977.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Mr. John N. Malyska argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Meyner, Landis & Verdon, attorneys).
Mr. Kevin W. Funabashi argued the cause for respondent Township of Mahwah (Messrs Breslin & Breslin, attorneys).
Mr. Gregory S. Baxter argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant Community Dog Control, Inc. (Messrs. Saling, Gassert & O'Mara, attorneys).
Mr. Norman A. Doyle, Jr. argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant Town of Kearny.
Mr. Gabriel M. Ambrosio argued the cause for respondent Township of Lyndhurst (Messrs. Ambrosio & Ambrosio, attorneys).
Before Judges LYNCH, MILMED and ANTELL.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Pressler's opinion reported at 138 N.J.Super. 322 (Law Div. 1975).
We note that in the trial judge's opinion the question of the viability of commercial contracts into which the Hudsontype municipalities have entered was reserved with leave granted to plaintiffs to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.