1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 74 N.J.
  5. 74 N.J. 312 (1977)
 

DOCK WATCH HOLLOW QUARRY PIT, INC. v. WARREN TP.

74 N.J. 312 (1977)

377 A.2d 1201

DOCK WATCH HOLLOW QUARRY PIT, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF WARREN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-CROSS-APPELLANT, AND THE TOWNSHIP OF BRIDGEWATER, DEFENDANT-CROSS-RESPONDENT, AND THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-CROSS-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided September 12, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Frederick C. Mezey argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent (Messrs. Mezey and Mezey, attorneys; Mr. Mezey, of counsel and on the brief; Mr. Mark L. Antin, on the brief).

Mr. J. Albert Mastro argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant (Mr. Mastro and Ms. Dolores A. Mastro, on the brief).

Mr. Daniel F. O'Connell argued the cause for cross-respondent (Messrs. Lanigan and O'Connell, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division.

Justice Schreiber would affirm the judgment of the trial court as modified by the dissenting opinion of Judge Morgan, reported at 142 N.J.Super. 130.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and HANDLER — 6.

Dissenting — Justice SCHREIBER...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases