SHULMAN, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of robbery. He brings this appeal solely on the general grounds, contending that inconsistencies and contradictions in the testimony of the state's witnesses render the evidence insufficient to support a verdict of guilty.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.