CHRISTOVAO v. UNISUL-UNIAO


41 N.Y.2d 338 (1977)

Joseph Christovao, Doing Business as Mercantum Trading Company, Appellant, v. Unisul-Uniao de Coop. Transf. de Tomate do sul do Tejo, S.C.R.L., et al., Respondents, and Attorney-General of the State of New York, Intervenor.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided February 22, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vito Vincenti, New York City, for appellant.

Charles L. Sylvester, New York City, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted and appeal dismissed. The dissent at the Appellate Division was not on a question of law in favor of the appellant within the meaning of CPLR 5601 (subd [a], par [i]). Plaintiff attempted to assert jurisdiction over the persons of the defendants and, through an attachment, over their property. Special Term ordered the complaint dismissed on the grounds that personal jurisdiction was lacking (CPLR 302; 3211, subd...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases