WASHINGTON SUBURBAN SANITARY COMMISSION ET AL.
v.
TKU ASSOCIATES ET AL. A. ALFRED TAUBMAN ET AL. T/A TKU ASSOCIATES ET AL.
v.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND ET AL.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided July 15, 1977.
Decided July 15, 1977.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
In appeal No. 6, J. Lloyd Niles, with whom were Paul T. Sisson and Joan I. Gordon on the brief, for Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission, part of appellants. Warren K. Rich, Assistant Attorney General, with whom were Edward F. Lawson, Assistant Attorney General, Francis B. Burch, Attorney General, and Paul Walter, Assistant Attorney General, on the brief, for other appellant.
In appeal No. 6, Howard J. Thomas, with whom were Bradshaw, Thomas & Yeatman; Charles R. Donnenfeld; John W. Currie; Douglas G. Green; Arent, Fox, Kintner, Plotkin & Kahn; Smith, Miro, Hirsch, Brody & Zweig and Hogan & Hartson on the brief, for appellees.
In appeal No. 133, Charles R. Donnenfeld, with whom were Douglas G. Green; Cameron M. Blake; Arent, Fox, Kintner, Plotkin & Kahn; Hogan & Hartson; Howard J. Thomas; Bradshaw, Thomas & Yeatman and Smith, Miro, Hirsch, Brody & Zweig on the brief, for appellants.
In appeal No. 133, Gus B. Bauman, Associate General Counsel, for Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, part of appellees. Richard E. Frederick, Assistant County Attorney, with whom was Richard S. McKernon, County Attorney on the brief, for Montgomery County, Maryland, another appellee. Roger W. Titus for Citizens Coordinating Committee on Friendship Heights, Inc. et al., other appellees.
The causes were argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES, LEVINE and ORTH, JJ.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
MURPHY, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.
We deal here in a single opinion with two separate but related appeals involving a developer's plan to construct a large commercial mall in Montgomery County, Maryland. Primarily at issue in Appeal No. 6 is whether the Circuit Court for Montgomery County (Mathias, J.) was correct in holding that the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission (the WSSC) improperly denied the developer...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
