TISDALE v. HASSLINGER

No. 75-616.

79 Wis.2d 194 (1977)

255 N.W.2d 314

TISDALE, and others, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. HASSLINGER, Defendant-Appellant: JOHNS, and another, Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided July 1, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant the cause was submitted on the briefs of Dahms & Brewer of Oconomowoc.

For the respondent American Family Mutual Insurance Company, the cause was submitted on the brief of Berg & Holznecht of Janesville.


HANLEY, J.

There being no issue of fact that James M. Tisdale was less than 12 years old on the date of injury, was employed in violation of law as to his age, and was injured in an occurrence arising out of a power driven machine, Judge Gergen granted the insurance company's motion for summary judgment. David G. Hasslinger has appealed, arguing that the decision retroactively applies sec. 103.67 (2), Stats., so as to unconstitutionally...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases