CONKLIN v. CITY OF EAST ORANGE


73 N.J. 198 (1977)

373 A.2d 996

WILLIAM W. CONKLIN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF EAST ORANGE, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 13, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Ernest N. Giannone argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Giannone & Capone, attorneys).

Mr. Alfred F. Carolonza, Jr., argued the cause for respondent.


The opinion of the court was delivered by SULLIVAN, J.

This appeal involves the interplay between two statutes. The first is N.J.S.A. 34:15-43, a section of the Workmen's Compensation Act, which makes the Act applicable to public employees but contains the following limitation:

"No former employee who has been retired on pension by reason of injury or disability shall be entitled under this section to compensation for such injury or disability; provided...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases