1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 234 S.E.2d
  5. 234 S.E.2d 37 (1977)
 

STATE v. DIXON

No. 7619SC886.

234 S.E.2d 37 (1977)

33 N.C. App. 78

STATE of North Carolina v. Crowder DIXON, Jr.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 20, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten, by Associate Atty. James E. Scarbrough, Raleigh, for the State.

Burke, Donaldson & Holshouser, by George L. Burke, Jr., Salisbury, for defendant-appellant.

VAUGHN, Judge.

We have considered defendant's exceptions Nos. 2, 4 and 5, taken in connection with his examination of the proposed character witness. If exception No. 2 relates to a question propounded, that question is not set out as required by Rule 9(c)(1) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. Exception No. 3 has been abandoned.

Exception No. 4 is without merit. Defendant asked the following question:

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases