1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 73 N.J.
  5. 73 N.J. 185 (1977)
 

BEEK v. OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

73 N.J. 185 (1977)

373 A.2d 654

RONALD BEEK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 13, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Thomas M. Guiney argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. DeYoe, Guiney and Raziano, attorneys).

Mr. Elwyn Saviet argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Gelman and Gelman, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

We affirm essentially for the reasons expressed by Judge Bischoff, 135 N.J.Super. 1 (App. Div. 1975). The principle expressed in Motor Club of America Ins. Co. v. Phillips, 66 N.J. 277 (1974) is equally applicable to the factual situation here. We see no reason to differentiate between the plaintiff's use of a non-owned or owned vehicle insofar as recovery is warranted under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases