WOLF v. SACHSE

No. 75-151.

75 Wis.2d 147 (1977)

248 N.W.2d 407

WOLF, Appellant, v. SACHSE, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided January 6, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Hippenmeyer, Reilly & Arenz, and oral argument by Dale W. Arenz, all of Waukesha.

For the respondent there was a brief by Johnson & Brendemuehl, and oral argument by William A. Swendson, all of Oconomowoc.


ROBERT W. HANSEN, J.

The sole question to be answered is whether or not there was delivery of the stock certificates to this defendant within the meaning of the relevant statute. If there was such required delivery, valid consideration exists for defendant's promises to pay and the trial court judgment must then be reversed. If, however, there was not such required delivery, then there was no consideration given for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases