LE DUC v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION

No. 1 CA-IC 1577.

116 Ariz. 95 (1977)

567 P.2d 1224

Aurora LE DUC, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, Arden-Mayfair, Inc., d/b/a El Rancho Markets, Respondent Employer, Great American Insurance Co., Respondent Carrier.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C.

August 4, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Davis, Eppstein & Tretschok by Robert W. Eppstein, Tucson, for petitioner.

John H. Budd, Jr., Chief Counsel, The Industrial Commission of Arizona, Phoenix, for respondent.

Shimmel, Hill, Bishop & Gruender, P.C. by J. Russell Skelton, Phoenix, for respondents Employer and Carrier.


OPINION

JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.

On this review the petitioner questions the sufficiency of the evidence to support the Commission's finding which limited her loss of earning capacity to 39.26%. Precisely, is there any reasonable evidence that the petitioner can be employed as a restaurant hostess/cashier?

Petitioner, Aurora Le Duc, while employed as a check-out cashier at the El Rancho Market, suffered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases