1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 76 Wis.2d
  5. 76 Wis.2d 133 (1977)
 

VIGIL v. STATE

No. 75-602-CR.

76 Wis.2d 133 (1977)

250 N.W.2d 378

VIGIL, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided February 15, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by Howard B. Eisenberg, state public defender, and Jack E. Schairer, assistant state public defender, and oral argument by Mr. Schairer.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Betty R. Brown, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.

DAY, J.

On February 11, 1975 the plaintiff in error (hereinafter defendant) was convicted in a trial before the court of violation of secs. 553.21 (2), and 553.52 (1), Stats. 1973 which are part of the Wisconsin Franchise Investment Law.1

Sentence was withheld and the defendant was placed on probation for three years and ordered to pay restitution to the alleged victim. The trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases