GRIMES, J.
The question in this case is whether the evidence supports a finding that defendant's actions constitute disorderly conduct in violation of RSA 644:2. We hold that they do.
Defendant was charged with a violation of RSA 644:2 II(d) in that she did "with the purpose to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm or recklessly creating a risk thereof did in a public place, to wit, Exeter Bowling Alleys, engage in a course of abusive or obscene language...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.