MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF MAUSER


559 P.2d 1310 (1977)

28 Or.App. 525

In the matter of the Dissolution of the Marriage of Fred G. Mauser, Respondent-Cross-Appellant, and Lucille I. Mauser, Appellant-Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 14, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth M. Abraham, Hood River, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With him on the brief was Parker, Abraham & Ball, Hood River.

James M. Habberstad, The Dalles, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant. With him on the brief was Dick & Dick, The Dalles.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and THORNTON and RICHARDSON, JJ.


THORNTON, Judge.

Wife appeals from a dissolution decree of this seven-year marriage contending that one of its provisions is unclear, that the court failed to provide adequate support for the wife and that the attorney's fees awarded were inadequate. Husband cross-appeals arguing that a property award is inappropriate in this case.

We note at the outset that the award of $2,400 attorney's fees was not an abuse of discretion, Bohren v. Bohren,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases