ROBERT W. HANSEN, J.
Defendant and his insurer make two claims on this appeal: (1) That the testimony of Dr. Albert Ficke was prejudicially allowed to reach the jury; and (2) that the award of damages made by the jury is excessive. Each claim will be considered separately.
WAS THE DOCTOR'S OPINION PROPERLY ADMISSIBLE?
We answer this question in the affirmative.
The sharp focus of challenge is to the trial court's permitting the medical witness...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
