KRENZER v. STOFFEL

Patent Appeal No. 9198.

551 F.2d 1214 (1977)

John KRENZER, Petitioner, v. Paul J. STOFFEL and Ignatius Schumacher, Respondents.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

March 10, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arnold H. Cole, St. Louis, Mo., C. Frederick Leydig, Stephen G. Rudisill, Leydig, Voit, Osann, Mayer & Holt Ltd., Chicago, Ill., Richard H. Bradford, Gardiner, Sixbey & Bradford, Arlington, Va., attorneys of record, for appellant.

Robert J. Schwarz, Chicago, Ill., Francis D. Thomas, Bacon & Thomas, Arlington, Va., Donald A. Peterson, Neuman, Williams, Anderson & Olson, Chicago, Ill., attorneys of record, for appellees.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, BALDWIN, LANE and MILLER, Judges.


RICH, Judge.

This case is before us on a petition by the party Krenzer to "recall, set aside and vacate" our mandate in appeal No. 9198, decided June 27, 1974.1 The basis for the petition is an alleged fraud on this court and on the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Interferences (board) by the respondents Stoffel and Schumacher (Stoffel). Stoffel has requested oral argument. We deny the Krenzer petition; the Stoffel request...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases