1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 565 P.2d
  5. 565 P.2d 1107 (1977)
 

BD. OF COM'RS OF COOS CTY. v. L.C. & D.C.

565 P.2d 1107 (1977)

29 Or.App. 909

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF COOS COUNTY, Petitioner, v. The Land Conservation and Development Commission, League of Women Voters of Coos County, an Affiliate of an Oregon Non-Profit Corporation, Bay Area Environmental Committee of Coos Bay, 1000 Friends of Oregon, an Oregon Non-Profit Organization, Lilah L. Chambers, Avis Chiapuzio, Judy W. Dixon, Don Loftus, Don Mosher, Merrill Mosher, Holly Hall, Meridith I. Leegard, George P. Potter, James H. Sherman, Lorel Smith, Norma Smith and Nora G. Terwilliger, Respondents, City of North Bend and Coos-Curry Council of Governments, Intervenors-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 27, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Bagg, Coquille, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

W. Benny Won, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent Land Conservation and Development Commission. With him on the brief were James A. Redden, Atty. Gen., W. Michael Gillette, Sol. Gen., and Peter S. Herman, Senior Counsel, Salem.

Richard Benner, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents League of Women Voters of Coos County, an affiliate of an Oregon non-profit corporation; Bay Area Environmental Committee of Coos Bay; 1000 Friends of Oregon, an Oregon non-profit organization; Lilah L. Chambers; Avis Chiapuzio; Judy W. Dixon; Don Loftus; Don Mosher; Merrill Mosher; Holly Hall; Meridith I. Leegard; George P. Potter; James H. Sherman; Lorel Smith; Norma Smith and Nora G. Terwilliger.

No appearance by Intervenors-Respondents.

Before THORNTON, P.J., and TANZER and RICHARDSON, JJ.

RICHARDSON, Judge.

This is an appeal by the Board of Commissioners of Coos County (County) from an order of the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC). The County makes two assignments of error. (1) The LCDC lacks jurisdiction to review the Coos County Comprehensive Plan for compliance with the state-wide Citizens Involvement Goal. (2) The Commission's order is unlawful in substance in that the order does not comply with the Commission's decision made...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases