PER CURIAM.
The question here on appeal concerns the alleged error of the trial court in denying the Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend where the denial was predicated primarily on the fact that nearly two and one-half years had elapsed from the filing of the third party complaint to the time of the motion to amend (Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.190).
Appellant Wackenhut Protective Services, Inc., as plaintiff, filed its complaint for
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.