1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 439 F.Supp.
  5. 439 F.Supp. 1060 (1977)
 

PAPERCRAFT CORP. v. PROCTER & GAMBLE CO.

Civ. A. No. 77-45.

439 F.Supp. 1060 (1977)

PAPERCRAFT CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Knomark, Inc., a New York Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. The PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, an Ohio Corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

September 27, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marcus Aaron, II, Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Alexander Unkovic, Frederick J. Francis, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

OPINION

MARSH, District Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this action seeking a declaratory judgment that certain patents held by the defendant are invalid or are not infringed by the manufacture, sale or use of plaintiffs' fabric conditioner product. Defendant has filed a motion under Rule 12(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., seeking to have the action dismissed or transferred and alleging, inter alia, that venue in this district

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases