1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 571 P.2d
  5. 571 P.2d 922 (1977)
 

STATE v. DIXON

571 P.2d 922 (1977)

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Arcelious DIXON, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 5, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles V. Elliott, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Kathleen Dahlin, Certified Law Student, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were James A. Redden, Atty. Gen., and Al J. Laue, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and LEE and BUTTLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that his defense was prejudiced by the state's failure to comply with the discovery statute, ORS 135.815, and that therefore his conviction for prostitution should be reversed. Not only did defendant not make a record of any specific prejudice, he did not request discovery in accordance with the discovery statute, ORS 135.845.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases