JEWELL v. COMPTON


559 P.2d 874 (1977)

277 Or. 93

Gordon E. JEWELL and Blanche Jewell, Respondents, v. Richard N. COMPTON and Joyce Compton, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Petition for Rehearing January 4, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard N. Compton, pro se.

No appearance contra.

Before DENECKE, C.J., and McALLISTER, O'CONNELL, TONGUE, HOWELL, BRYSON and BOHANNON, JJ.


On Appellants' Petition for Rehearing January 4, 1977.

BOHANNON, Judge pro tem.

In our original opinion we held that on the record before us the trial court's judgment must be affirmed because the findings of fact supported the judgment. The trial court held that the burden was on the defendants to establish the allegations of their counterclaim and found that:

"Both the value of the services and their application to the note are vigorously disputed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases