BANK OF NEW ORLEANS AND TRUST CO. v. BIG B TOWBOAT SERVICES, INC.

Civ. A. No. 77-105-C(1).

435 F.Supp. 997 (1977)

The BANK OF NEW ORLEANS AND TRUST COMPANY v. BIG B TOWBOAT SERVICES, INCORPORATED, et al.

United States District Court, E. D. Missouri, E. D.

April 29, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael D. O'Keefe, Thompson & Mitchell, St. Louis, Mo., for The Bank of New Orleans & Trust Co.

Banker Phares, Phares, Phares & Bass, Port Arthur, Tex., for Marine Fueling Service Inc.

James W. Herron, Lewis, Rice, Tucker, Allen & Chubb, St. Louis, Mo., G. Byron Sims, Brown, Teed, Sims, Ayre, Glassman & Luther, Houston, Tex., for B-421 Inc. and Hollywood Marine Inc.

John E. Galloway, McGlinchey, Stafford, Mintz & Hoffman, New Orleans, La., for Blue Ridge Ins. Co.

A. Clay Rankin, II, J. Hodge Alves, III, Hand, Arendall, Bedsole, Greaves & Johnston, Mobile, Ala., for State of Alabama.

James E. McDaniel and Walter F. Timm, Barnard & Baer, St. Louis, Mo., for State of Alabama, Birney A. Rousselle, dba Marine Fueling Service Inc., Algiers Iron Works, etc.

A. Gordon Grant, Jr., Montgomery, Barnett, Brown & Read, New Orleans, La., for Birney A. Rousselle, d/b/a/ etc.

Charles Hanemann, Houma, La., for Big B Towboat Services, Inc.

Wray & Robinson, Baton Rouge, La., and Frank E. Strzelec, Kortenhof & Ely, St. Louis, Mo., for Cummins Sales & Service.

Joel J. Henderson, Swank, Lane & Associates, Greenville, Miss., and Samuel B. Murphy, Jr., St. Louis, Mo., for Specialized & Marine Credit.

John B. Carothers, III, Thompson, Walther, Shewmaker & Gaebe, St. Louis, Mo., for Vince Guzzetta, d/b/a and for Stapp Bros. Towing, Inc.

Wayne Anderson, Hinds & Meyer, Houston, Tex., for Hunter Flores, Inc.

James D. Edgar, Webster Groves, Mo., for Allied Chemical Corp.


FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

MEREDITH, Chief Judge.

This action, having been heard by the Court this day upon the motion of the plaintiff for default judgment and plaintiff appearing by its attorney and no person having appeared to claim the defendant vessel or any interest therein, the Court having considered the evidence and exhibits submitted by the plaintiff, and being fully advised in the premises, does now make the following Findings of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases