At the outset, the general rule should be noted that if a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action (CPLR 3211, subd [a], par 7) is addressed to the complaint in its
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PARK v. CHESSIN
60 A.D.2d 80 (1977)
Steven M. Park et al., Individually and as Administrators of The Estate of Lara E. Park, Deceased, Respondents, v. Herbert Chessin et al., Appellants
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 11, 1977
December 11, 1977
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Martin, Clearwater & Bell (
Toberoff & Gould for respondents.
MARGETT and RABIN, JJ., concur with DAMIANI, J.; COHALAN, J. P., concurs in the denial of the defendants' motion with respect to the sixth and part of the seventh causes of action, but otherwise dissents and votes to grant the defendants' motion with respect to the first and fifth causes of action, with an opinion; TITONE, J., dissents and votes to grant the motion to dismiss the four causes of action in question, with an opinion.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.