OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Convicted by jury of swindling in violation of NRS 465.070, appellant contends (1) his conduct did not violate the statute, (2) the trial court erred by admitting evidence of a prior offense, and (3) the trial court erred by admitting a photograph into evidence.
A Harrah's game observer saw appellant playing a $5 token slot machine by inserting
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.