1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 431 F.Supp.
  5. 431 F.Supp. 901 (1977)
 

ENRIQUEZ v. HONEYWELL, INC.

No. CIV-76-0432-E.

431 F.Supp. 901 (1977)

Valentino ENRIQUEZ, Michael Johnson, Charles Fields, Samuel Dewberry and Harry Sharp, Plaintiffs, v. HONEYWELL INC. and Magnetic Peripherals, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, W. D. Oklahoma.

May 23, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

D. Hayes Foster and A. Visanio Johnson, Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiffs.

Edward E. Soule and James C. Chandler of Lytle, Soule & Emery, Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendants.

Stephen S. Lewenberg, Waltham, Mass., and David A. Grabham, Minneapolis, Minn., of counsel, for Honeywell Inc.

Keith E. Goodwin of Oppenheimer, Wolff, Foster, Shepard & Donnelly, St. Paul, Minn., of counsel, for Magnetic Peripherals, Inc.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

EUBANKS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs assert claims arising out of alleged violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (the Civil Rights Act of 1870) and 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (Title VII).

Now before the court for disposition is defendants' motion for partial summary judgment. Defendants seek an order:

1) dismissing the Title VII claims of plaintiffs Johnson, Fields, Dewberry and Sharp; and, 2) dismissing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases