In a trial to the court, appellant was found guilty of the sale of marihuana, and was sentenced to five years imprisonment in the Department of Corrections.
Appellant makes three contentions for reversal. The first point is that the court erred in refusing to "quash" the indictment because it failed to specify the nature of the controlled substance allegedly sold, and failed to negative the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.