1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 568 F.2d
  5. 568 F.2d 722 (1977)
 

KARCH v. UNITED STATES

No. 298-69.

568 F.2d 722 (1977)

Krekel KARCH v. The UNITED STATES.

United States Court of Claims.

December 14, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John E. Juergensmeyer, Elgin, Ill., attorney of record, for plaintiff; Juergensmeyer, Zimmerman & Smith, Elgin, Ill., John Carlon and Carlon & Carlon, Normal, Ill., of counsel.

Frank R. Perillo, Princeton, N. J., with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen. Barbara Allen Babcock, Washington, D.C., for defendant.

Before COWEN, Senior Judge, DAVIS and KUNZIG, Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Trial Judge Colaianni has decided that plaintiff's patent relating to erosion and flood control and land reclamation is invalid for obviousness. Plaintiff has excepted to that determination. The court has considered the briefs and oral argument, and now adopts the trial judge's opinion (with minor modifications) as hereinafter set forth, as the basis for its judgment in the case.* Accordingly, it is concluded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases