1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 555 F.2d
  5. 555 F.2d 712 (1977)
 

INTERN. IN-FLIGHT CATERING, CO. v. NAT. MEDIATION BD.

Nos. 76-2652, 76-2749, 76-2897 and 76-2954.

555 F.2d 712 (1977)

INTERNATIONAL IN-FLIGHT CATERING CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD, Defendant-Appellant. INTERNATIONAL IN-FLIGHT CATERING CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, AIRLINE DIVISION, et al., Defendants-Appellants. INTERNATIONAL IN-FLIGHT CATERING CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD et al., Defendants, and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airline Division, et al., Defendants-Appellants. INTERNATIONAL IN-FLIGHT CATERING CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, AIRLINE DIVISION, et al., Defendants, and National Mediation Board, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied September 15, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Kanter, Michael H. Stein, U. S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., argued for National Mediation Bd.

Stephen H. Naiman, argued, Brundage, Beeson & Pappy, Los Angeles, Cal., Charles E. Murphy, argued, Michael G. Cleveland, Vedder, Price, Kaufman & Kammholz, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff-appellee.

Airline Indus. Relations Conf., Murray Gartner, argued, Poletti, Freidin, Prashker, Feldman & Gartner, New York City, for appellant, amicus curiae.

Before MERRILL, WRIGHT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied September 15, 1977.

J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

In this case the National Mediation Board certified that the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airline Division, was the bargaining representative for the employees of International In-Flight Catering Co., Ltd. The district court below found that this certification failed to comply with Section 2, Ninth, of the Railway Labor Act [45 U.S.C. § 151, et...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases