PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from a conviction of criminal mischief in the second degree. ORS 164.354. He contends that the trial court erred in failing to require a witness whom he had subpoenaed to appear. The trial judge refused to do so on the grounds that the witness, a physician, had informally communicated to the judge that he knew nothing about the matter.
We affirm without reaching the question of whether the trial judge's reasoning was correct,...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
