CECO CORP. v. BLISS & LAUGHLIN INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. 75-2552.

557 F.2d 687 (1977)

The CECO CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BLISS & LAUGHLIN INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 18, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William E. Lucas, argued, of McCaleb, Lucas & Brugman, Chicago, Ill., for defendant-appellant.

Clarence J. Fleming, argued, McDougall, Hersh & Scott, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CUMMINGS, GOODWIN and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff filed this suit in March 1974 seeking a declaratory judgment that Cunningham Patent No. 3,527,320 held by defendant is invalid or, in the alternative, not infringed by plaintiff's scaffolding. After a trial, the district court held the patent invalid on the grounds of obviousness and prior public use. The court also held that plaintiff's scaffold does not infringe the Cunningham claims, even if valid.

Arthur...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases