ROSE v. WHITBECK


564 P.2d 671 (1977)

278 Or. 463

Betty E. ROSE, Respondent, v. Nettie C. WHITBECK, Also Known As Nettie DeFord, and Theodore Rose, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided May 24, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David G. Frost, Frost & Hall, Hillsboro, for petitioner.

Before DENECKE, C.J., and HOLMAN, HOWELL, BRYSON, LENT and BRADSHAW, JJ.


BRYSON, Justice.

Defendant Theodore Rose (Ted), on petition for rehearing, contends that upon reversing the case as to petitioner's codefendant, both as to general and punitive damages, this court should have remanded the question of punitive damages as to Ted for a new trial.

This is a question of first impression for this court. In Fredeen v. Stride, 269 Or. 369, 375-76, 525 P.2d 166 (1974), we reversed the rule of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases