1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 572 P.2d
  5. 572 P.2d 654 (1977)
 

McPHERSON v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION

572 P.2d 654 (1977)

31 Or.App. 1277

Marlynn M. McPherson, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION and City of Salem, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 19, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David W. Hittle, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Mike Dye, and Dye & Olson, Salem.

No appearance for respondent Employment Division.

Jeannette M. Launer, Asst. City Atty., Salem, argued the cause for respondent City of Salem. With her on the brief was William J. Juza, City Atty., Salem.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and THORNTON and JOHNSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The sole issue in this unemployment compensation case is whether petitioner had good cause for terminating her employment. The referee found that she did not. The Employment Appeals Board agreed with the referee and adopted his opinion, as do we. It follows:

"ISSUE AND LAW: The issue is whether Claimant is disqualified from benefits under ORS 756.176 [657.176]. "FINDINGS OF FACT: (1) Claimant worked for the employer from February 3,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases