LOVERIDGE v. SCHILLBERG

Nos. 2527-2; 2528-2.

17 Wn. App. 96 (1977)

561 P.2d 1107

JOHN E. LOVERIDGE, Appellant, v. ROBERT SCHILLBERG, ET AL, Respondents. KENNETH HARRENSTEIN, Appellant, v. ROBERT SCHILLBERG, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.

March 11, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allen Ressler, Richard Emery, Lawrence F. Baker, and Baker & Palmer, for appellants.

Robert E. Schillberg, Prosecuting Attorney, David T. Patterson, Deputy, Lawrence B. Linville, and Clinton, Fleck, Glein & Brown, for respondents.


REED, J.

Plaintiffs John E. Loveridge and Kenneth Harrenstein, both twice convicted felons and parole violators, filed separate actions against the Prosecuting Attorney for Snohomish County and two of his deputies. Plaintiffs sought a writ of mandamus, an award of damages, and attorney's fees and costs for an alleged failure of defendants to furnish minimum term recommendations to the Board of Prison Terms and Paroles. Plaintiffs claimed they were damaged because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases