AMDAHL v. COUNTY OF FILLMORE

Nos. 47146 to 47149.

258 N.W.2d 869 (1977)

O. H. AMDAHL, Respondent, v. COUNTY OF FILLMORE, Appellant. Harold KARLI, Respondent, v. COUNTY OF FILLMORE, Appellant. Clayton E. FISHBAUGHER, Respondent, v. COUNTY OF FILLMORE, Appellant. Carl FANN, Respondent, v. COUNTY OF FILLMORE, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

September 30, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert R. Benson, County Atty., Preston, for appellant.

Baudler, Baudler & Maus, and Lawrence E. Maus, Austin, for Amdahl & Fann.

J. F. Herrick, Lanesboro, for Karli.

Gartner, Burkhardt, Shulman & Ekstrand, and David Shulman, Preston, for Fishbaugher.

Heard before ROGOSHESKE, SCOTT, and PLUNKETT, JJ., and considered and decided by the court en banc.


ROGOSHESKE, Justice.

In January 1976, the Fillmore County Board of Commissioners voted to raise in varying amounts the salaries of the county sheriff, auditor, treasurer, and county recorder.1 The board also set the budgets for all offices except that of the sheriff, approval of which was still pending. Thereafter, separate statutory appeals to the district court were instituted by the officers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases