1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 72 Cal.App.3d
  5. 72 Cal.App.3d 1021 (1977)
 

CONCERNED CITIZENS OF MURPHYS v. JACKSON

Docket No. 16639.

72 Cal.App.3d 1021 (1977)

140 Cal. Rptr. 531

CONCERNED CITIZENS OF MURPHYS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. NADINE JACKSON, as Clerk, etc., et al., Defendants and Respondents; JOHN W. MODRELL, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

August 30, 1977.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Neumiller & Beardslee and Arthur Cofod for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Richard A. Robyn, County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents.

No appearance for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

OPINION

EVANS, J.

The sole question at issue is whether a county may, by ordinance, restrict the right of appeal from a decision of the planning commission to dissatisfied applicants.

In April 1976, the Planning Commission of Calaveras County held a regularly noticed hearing upon an application for a conditional use permit to construct an aggregate and mineral recovery plant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases