HANDI INV. CO. v. MOBIL OIL CORP.

No. 75-1284.

550 F.2d 543 (1977)

HANDI INVESTMENT COMPANY, Robert M. Fridlund, Richard E. Fridlund, Everette H. Neal, Barbara Fridlund, Loretta Fridlund, and Patricia Neal, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 24, 1977.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. Joseph Bertain, Jr., Timothy H. Fine, argued, W. Thomas Amen, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Jack D. Fudge, argued, McCutchen, Black, Berleger & Shea, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and CRARY, District Judge.


PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs-appellants, Handi Investment Company (Handi) and the individual partners in that company and their wives, appeal from the summary judgment entered herein in favor of the defendant-appellee, Mobil Oil Corporation (Mobil). As stated by Handi, the law suit involves one cause of action for usury under Article XX, § 22, of the California Constitution, and § 1916 of the California Civil Code.

Jurisdiction in the District Court is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases