Denied.
TATE, J., dissents. Although the majority of this Court apparently feels that the court of appeal properly applied Coco, the court of appeal apparently reduced the awards based on its record—deduction of exaggeration. I see no sound reason for a reviewing court to reach this conclusion in opposition to the trior of fact, simply because similar injuries with similar medical treatment were received in the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
