CLEMENS, Presiding Judge.
On unchallenged evidence a jury found defendant guilty of tampering with a motor vehicle and he was sentenced to a year's imprisonment. He appeals, contending the trial court improperly denied his motion for new trial because of the state's allegedly improper closing argument. Defendant had not objected to the argument at trial.
The sufficiency of the state's evidence is unchallenged. In closing argument state's counsel obtusely referred...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
