Judgment reversed, on the facts, and indictment dismissed.
There was only contradictory and ambiguous evidence as to how the defendant-appellant's identity was established. Each of two police officers testified that the other had provided the defendant's name. Although a police informer was in the apartment at the time of the alleged sale, neither the informer, nor any of the other eight persons in the apartment, testified or provided any identification of the defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.