Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs jointly to respondents.
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding from evidence the testimony offered by the expert witness called by appellants (see Meiselman v Crown Hgts. Hosp., 285 N.Y. 389). The expert's qualifications were not such as would substantiate his status as an expert in the field of accident reconstruction (see Lopez v Yannotti,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.