METRO. TRANSP. AUTH. v. CITY OF NEW YORK


39 N.Y.2d 953 (1976)

Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided July 1, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Bernard Richland, Corporation Counsel (Alexander Gigante, Jr., and Nina G. Goldstein of counsel), for appellant.

Robert S. Rifkind and Stephen A. Oxman for respondent.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.


MEMORANDUM.

Order affirmed, without costs, on the memorandum at the Appellate Division, with these additional comments. The formula set forth in section 1277 of the Public Authorities Law dealing with "total" costs was never intended by the Legislature to call for a precise allocation of the costs of operation and maintenance of local stations as might be expected from the perspective of cost analysis. Rather it was a responsible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases