1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 56 Cal.App.3d
  5. 56 Cal.App.3d 41 (1976)
 

ZISK v. CITY OF ROSEVILLE

Docket No. 15121.

56 Cal.App.3d 41 (1976)

127 Cal. Rptr. 896

WILLIAM ZISK et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF ROSEVILLE, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

February 20, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Desmond, Miller, Desmond & Bartholomew, Richard F. Desmond and Stephen James Wagner for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Dennis W. DeCuir, City Attorney, G. Richard Brown and McDonough, Holland, Schwartz & Allen for Defendants and Appellants.

OPINION

PARAS, J.

Judgment was entered dismissing plaintiffs' complaint which alleged a first cause of action for inverse condemnation and a second cause of action for violation of the federal Civil Rights Act; this judgment was subsequently set aside; judgment was thereafter entered dismissing again the second cause of action and abating (by interlocutory judgment) the first cause of action (because of a prior condemnation action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases