1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 60 Cal.App.3d
  5. 60 Cal.App.3d 906 (1976)
 

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO v. PACE

Docket No. 37645.

60 Cal.App.3d 906 (1976)

132 Cal. Rptr. 151

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANTHONY B. PACE et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

August 11, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Fitzgerald, Johnson, Berg & Edgar and William R. Edgar for Defendants and Appellants.

Thomas M. O'Connor, City Attorney, Edw. C.A. Johnson and Dianne K. Barry, Deputy City Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

ELKINGTON, J.

Appellants Pace had been the owners of two small San Francisco buildings, one with three residential units and the other with two, for more than twenty years. They neither resided, nor intended to reside, in either. And they had never held an electrical contractor's license according to the contractors license law (div. 3, ch. 9, of the Bus. & Prof. Code). Appropriate municipal authority ordered certain improvements...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases