1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 51 A.D.2d
  5. 51 A.D.2d 914 (1976)
 

SCHNEIDERMAN v. SCHNEIDERMAN

51 A.D.2d 914 (1976)

Carol A. Schneiderman, Respondent, v. Raphael Schneiderman, Also Known as Ray Schneiderman, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 4, 1976

On this record we are not convinced that Special Term abused its discretion in retroactively applying the compulsory financial disclosure policy enunciated in section 250 of the Domestic Relations Law. While we respect the reasoning of the dissenter, we are of the opinion that in view of the policy declared by the Legislature, it would serve no useful purpose to hold that there was an abuse of discretion below in the circumstances of this case.

Stevens

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases