While the respondent-appellant argues here that the petitioner in this article 78 proceeding had not exhausted its administrative remedy, it did not so answer the petition at the Special Term. It did not answer at all, but elected to respond only by informally asking for a remand for further testimony. When the Special Term properly concluded that there were no grounds sufficient to warrant a remand, it properly granted...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
