WRIGHT v. WRIGHT

No. 11906.

546 P.2d 394 (1976)

97 Idaho 439

Janice WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald Newton WRIGHT, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

February 25, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. Don Copple, Davison, Copple & Copple, Boise, for plaintiff-appellant.

Perce E. Hall, Hall & Friedly, Mountain Home, for defendant-respondent.


PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment for defendant following trial in an action by plaintiff for money damages arising from the alleged breach of defendant's promise to pay an antecedent debt of plaintiff. We affirm.

Plaintiff-appellant Janice Wright and defendant-respondent Donald Newton Wright were formerly husband and wife. During the time of the marriage plaintiff borrowed a sum of money from a bank evidenced by a promissory note bearing only...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases