STANBACK v. STANBACK

No. 7619SC413.

229 S.E.2d 693 (1976)

31 N.C. App. 174

Fred J. STANBACK, Jr. v. Vanita B. STANBACK.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

October 20, 1976.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hudson, Petree, Stockton, Stockton & Robinson by Norwood Robinson and George L. Little, Jr., Winston Salem and Kluttz & Hamlin by Clarence Kluttz, Salisbury, for plaintiff-appellee.

Walser, Brinkley, Walser & McGirt by Walter F. Brinkley, Lexington, for defendant-appellant.


BRITT, Judge.

First, defendant contends the trial court committed error when it did not permit her "to offer full and complete evidence when the evidence she attempted to offer was both relevant and pertinent". We find no merit in this contention.

Under this contention defendant argues that in presenting her case it was necessary that she bring out many pertinent facts relating to the background of the long controversy between her and plaintiff; that the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases