1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 88 Misc.2d
  5. 88 Misc.2d 833 (1976)
 

KAMINSKY v. VAN DUSEN

88 Misc.2d 833 (1976)

Frank Kaminsky, Plaintiff, v. William R. Van Dusen et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Broome County.

December 15, 1976

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Barber for plaintiff. David J. Menke for William R. Van Dusen and another, defendants. Conte & Helisek (Kenneth P. Helisek of counsel), for Van Dusen Roofing Company, Inc., defendant.

RICHARD F. KUHNEN, J.

This is a motion for summary judgment under CPLR 3213 based upon an instrument for the payment of money only.

The instrument is written on a personalized check form of the Endicott Trust Company. The names of the defendants William R. Van Dusen and Betty Van Dusen are printed at the top of the form and the signatures of these defendants appear at the bottom right hand corner. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases