1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.2d
  4. 39 N.Y.2d
  5. 39 N.Y.2d 873 (1976)
 

STATE DIV. OF HUMAN RIGHTS v. XEROX CORP.

39 N.Y.2d 873 (1976)

State Division of Human Rights, Appellant, v. Xerox Corporation, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided June 3, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daan Braveman for Raymond Freeman, appellant.

Richard N. Chapman and Peter J. Spinelli for respondent.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.

MEMORANDUM.

The Appellate Division order should be affirmed.

Petitioner, a Black, asserts that respondent's employment policy of temporarily suspending certain employees who are arrested for serious crimes constitutes an unlawful discriminatory practice because statistical evidence establishes that Blacks are more likely to be arrested than whites. We find the argument unavailing. Were it true that respondent's policy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases