1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 59 Cal.App.3d
  5. 59 Cal.App.3d 852 (1976)
 

STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO. v. HARTLE

Docket No. 37535.

59 Cal.App.3d 852 (1976)

131 Cal. Rptr. 141

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SHEREE HARTLE et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

June 28, 1976.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Nagle, Vale, McDowall & Cotter and Vernon V. Vale for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Gassett, Perry, Frank & Bondelie and Joseph H. Huber for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

EMERSON, J.*

In this action for declaratory relief, plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (hereafter State Farm) appeals from a judgment which decreed that appellant was obligated to provide coverage to one Bardelmeier as a permissive user of an automobile under a policy issued in favor of respondent Hartle. The facts of the case are not in dispute. The question presented is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases